CFP LLT Special Issue on: Corpora in Language Learning and Teaching

CALL FOR PAPERS, LLT Special Issue on: Corpora in Language Learning and Teaching
Special issue editors: Nina Vyatkina and Alex Boulton
Corpora in their many guises have been applied for the purposes of language learning and language teaching since they emerged in their modern form in the 1960s. Whereas originally, more  pedagogical applications were of indirect nature with corpus-based studies informing the contents of  textbooks and reference grammars, recent years have seen an exponential growth of more direct applications, also known as Data-Driven Learning (DDL). These developments have been documented in a variety of publications, most notably in the series of edited volumes containing selected papers from the  biannual Teaching and Language Corpora (TaLC) conferences as well as special issues of several major  journals. Since the only LLT special issue on this topic was published in 2001, the time has now come to  take stock of the new developments in how corpora can be of help to language teachers, learners, and other users.
For this special issue, we seek proposals that present theoretically grounded and methodologically rigorous empirical studies of language learning processes or outcomes in DDL contexts using corpora, broadly defined to include native speaker corpora, second language learner corpora, pedagogical corpora, multimodal corpora, the web-as-corpus, etc. These contexts may include direct explorations of corpora by  learners, indirect applications with teacher-prepared corpus-based activities, and any combinations  thereof. We especially welcome proposals that aim to fill existing research gaps by reporting on the use of  new DDL technologies (e.g., corpus tools beyond concordancers, corpora in CALL packages), the  effectiveness of different DDL types, specific DDL effects beneficial for language learning (e.g., input enrichment and enhancement, learner autonomy, guided induction), integration of DDL instruction  modules into regular curricula, as well as languages other than English, instructional contexts other than university, teachers other than DDL researchers, and comparisons of different learning styles, motivations, levels, or profiles.
Methodologically, we would like to invite more longitudinal and/or mixed-method studies which integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Please note that articles containing only descriptions of corpora, software, or pedagogical procedures without presenting in-depth empirical data will not be considered. Furthermore, we cannot accept studies that analyze or compare linguistic data from learner and native speaker corpora but that do not consider teaching and learning processes and outcomes as the major focus of the paper.
Please consult the LLT website for general guidelines on submission
Send a title and 300-word abstract in a word document by February 1, 2016 to llt@hawaii.edu
Publication timeline:
February 1, 2016: Submission deadline for abstracts
February 15, 2016: Invitation to authors to submit a manuscript
July 15, 2016: Submission deadline for manuscripts
October 1, 2017: Publication of special issue

http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2015/call.pdf

Corpus Linguistics #cl2015: notes and pics

Corpus Linguistics Conference 2015, University of Lancaster, UK

Thanks to @TonyMcEnery, @HardieResearch and everybody at @UCREL_Lancaster for organizing a wonderful conference.

Abstract book download:

Adobe-PDF-Document-icon

A selection of talks and personal notes:

Learner corpus research plenary #cl2015

Multi-dimensional analysis of oral proficiency interviews #cl2015

Non-obvious meaning in CL and CADS #cl2015

Representation of benefit claimants in UK media #cl2015

Tono Linguistic feature extraction #cefr #cl2015

Language learning theories underpinning corpus-based pedagogy #cl2015

MA of L2 learner English

And some pics:

 

IMG_20150730_215443

Robert Poole (left)

IMG_20150730_215522

Ricardo Jiménez

IMG_20150730_215840

 

IMG_20150722_210050

Carlos Ordoñana (left)

IMG-20150723-WA0015

Lynne Flowerdew

IMG-20150723-WA0006

Carlos Ordoñana (left) and Yukio Tono (right)

IMG-20150724-WA0009

Discussing the representation of immigrants in the context of the LADEX project.

IMG-20150724-WA0010

Discussing the representation of immigrants in the context of the LADEX project.

IMG-20150723-WA0006

Carlos Ordoñana (left) and Yukio Tono (right)

IMG-20150723-WA0009

Yolanda Noguera and John Flowerdew

IMG-20150723-WA0011

Yukio Tono (middle)

IMG_20150730_215950

Yolanda Noguera and Michael Barlow

 

 

Cardiff language and Law: Symposium Nov 2015 & Corpus Approaches to Public & Professional Discourse

 

From the Forensic Linguistics e-mail list

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Symposium on “Expertise in Language and Law” will take place on Friday 27th November 2015.

This Symposium is part of the Advanced Research Residency in Language and Law which takes place at Cardiff University from October to December this year. The full program

me of events is at: http://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/call/.

The Symposium is followed, on Saturday 28th November, by a Conference entitled “Corpus Approaches to Public and Professional Discourse” (http://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/corpus/).

 

 

Multi-dimensional analysis of oral proficiency interviews #cl2015

 

IMG_20150723_113417

Shelley Staples; Jesse Egbert; Geoff LaFlair

A multi-dimensional comparison of oral proficiency interviews to conversation, academic and professional spoken registers

MELAB : Michigan Engish Language Battery 989 OPIs in 2013

OPI used for academic and profesional purposes

Only transcribed the first 5 minutes

55 linguistic features

TagCount

FA

6 factor solution

Dimensions interpreted functionally

Dimension scores

Differences across registers (ANOVAs and post hocs)

 

6 dimension

1. Explicit stance: private verbs, that deletion, lower rates of implicit stance that the Longman corpus

3. Speaker-centered informational vs listener centered involvement: pro1, subject-conj.causative, nn, amplifiers,

4. Extended informational discourse: word length, prep, jj atr, that rel, negative features: all pronouns

6. Implicit stance: higher rates of implicit stance that the Longman corpus

 

 

Non-obvious meaning in CL and CADS #cl2015

IMG_20150723_100414

Plenary session: Alan Partington
Non-obvious meaning in CL and CADS: from ‘hindsight post-dictability’ to sweet serendipity

Chair: Amanda Potts

http://www3.lingue.unibo.it/blog/clb/

Introspection & intuition

Processes of inference from the linguistic trace left by speakers/writers

Shared meaning

Idiom principle

Complexity of common grammatical items

Colligation: every word primed to occur in or avoid certain grammatical positions and functions (Hoey, 2005: 13)

SiBol (Siena-Bologna) corpus of newspapers, judicial inquiries, press briefings. Link.

Rapid language change

Corpus methodology is useful in detecting absence, not only presence

Language looks rather different when you look at a lot of it at once (Sinclair 1991)

Qualitative: anaphoric, historic, past behaviour

Quantitative anaphoric and cataphoric; enough data with which to infer

If primed >> psychologically fixed >> reproduced

Evaluation as prototypicality: inner circle obvious, outer circle non-obvious

Prosody can depend on grammar (Louw 1993), pov, literal vs figurative use and on field of register

Embedding is an important factor to interpret prosody

The added value of CL in discourse studies

Looking at language at different levels of abstraction: overview & close reading

Data are not sacred

Much of textual meaning is accretional

Positive cherry-picking: find counter examples

Almost all explanation in DA is informed speculation: in human science this is the closest you get to explanation

Moral panics have evolved over the years (globesity in 2015)